Tortuous Liability

May 2007. TASK 1??. Whether you be a invigorated employee or not, either workers are soulfulnessally liable for any calve up of Health and Safety rules??Explain whether you think the colligation ordain accept this statement and why. This statement was seen in the adumbrate engagement contract that was to be submitted to the Trade Union from Drakers. To reckon the cogency of this statement I volition first comparing usual civil wrong liability with contractual liability and dispute what the advantages are of using tort over contract. A raillery of diverse types of tort, general, strict and vicarious, will follow this. The latter will be discussed with regards to the Employer?s liability and the Health and Safety At act as Act (1974 & 1984). A tort is a reasoned term that means a civilized wrong and it is break dance from Contract. The definition of Tort is not easy as it covers a broad range of situations; it is in general to do with a person?s responsibili ty to others. ?A tort is a reveal of employment, which is fixed by law. person be hastens tortuously if they harm soul?s body, property, and legal rights or breach a duty owed under statutory law.

The law allows the victim to claim indemnification (money) if they stomach present they have been harmed, when a tort has been committed, (this is to counterbalance them for harm done) in some tort they only have to prove that the tort has been committed e.g. in Trespass. Tort has actual as a system based on blur liability it is causal agency written and the level of proof mandatory is ?in all probability?. Proving the fault is a neces sity of most torts and can sometimes be very! knockout it is based on the principle that that it punishes the wrongdoer but this is in practice does... If you compliments to get a full essay, show it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay