Sunday, January 8, 2017

Scientists in the 16th and 17th Centuries

Scientists and their bleed underwent an phylogeny equal to artists of the Renaissance, during the Scientific mutation of the 16th and seventeenth centuries. Scientists much(prenominal) as Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Isaac Newton proven to be influential and revolutionary. The work of the aforementioned scientists was both positively and negatively affected by the social, political, and religious factors of the time. During the 16th and 17th centuries, the Church had great defy all over science, especially ideas that would compensate the teachings of the Bible. Copernicus was ostracized for his heliocentric model, and as a result in a later publication Copernicus writes to pope Paul III, It is to your Holiness quite an than to anyone else that I have chosen to dedicate these studies of mine (Doc 1). Copernicus views the pontiff as very powerful, accordingly Copernicus writes this to gain the pontiffs support in dress for his work to be more successful. This depicts how the Catholic Church negatively affected these scientists because Copernicus had to appease the Pope to make sure he was not attacked. Even when scientists appeased to the Pope, topical anesthetic clergymen were even more battleful in their attacks on scientists. As seen in Doc 3., Giovanni Ciampoli, an Italian monk, writes angrily to Galileo, It is indispensable, therefore, to remove the speculation of malignant rumors by repeatedly showing your willingness to defer to the consent of those who have jurisdiction over the human intellect, in matters of the interlingual rendition of Scripture. This document shows the true, unfiltered attitude of clergymen towards scientists because remote the Pope, Giovanni did not need to reckon politically correct when create verbally to Galileo, he could truly deliver his mind. Doc 3 likewise illustrates how religion, on a big scale, could negatively affect and bid the work of scientists. This level of verify is depicted by scientists who however based science on r...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.